Computers
Lions
Gloves
Ladies
Buses
Knives
Potatoes
Desks
Boats
Children
Boys
Sheep
Legs
Watches
Teeth
Flowers
Plays
Umbrellas
Feet
Phones
People
Armchairs
Tomatoes
Theaters
Wolves
Oxen
Women
Subways
Deer
Elephants
Monkeys
Foxes
Families
Geese
Butterflies
Trams
Daddies
Men
Если не согласен
It depends on which zoo they are different. When a bad zoo is bad, when a good zoo is good. Folding your opinion you should get rid of anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism of animals. For us, people, the cells are “prison”, this is “non-freedom” and this is a priori bad. But animals are not people. In nature, in general, there is no "freedom", it is a myth like the "pious savage" Rousseau. Under natural conditions, as a rule, the habitat of animals is limited to the territory sandwiched between the same territories of neighboring individuals, and when they try to cross their border, they will be attacked and possibly killed. For some small animals, their aviary in the zoo is many times more free and spacious than where they live in "nature". In many cases, the walls of the cage and the enclosures of the enclosures, they do not keep animals there, no, they protect animals from us here.
Если согласен
I think animals should not be in a zoo, but in their natural environment - nature. Because the zoo isolates animals from their original habitat.
2)We didn't spoke Arabic
3)My uncle didn't science
4)I didn't took my father to the mointains
5)We didn't told the police everything
6)I didn't wrote to my brother
7)I didn't liked the music
8) We didn't knew phone number.
Four monkeys behind the door